Chattie vs Lusha: AI SDR vs B2B Contact Database

Last updated: September 2026 · B2B Contact Database & Enrichment · Free tier; paid plans quote-only

The verdict

Lusha gives you the phone number and the email; Chattie gives you the reply. One is a data source, the other is the conversation layer, and most teams that use both keep both.

What is Lusha?

Lusha is a B2B contact data provider founded in 2016. Its browser extension and platform reveal verified emails, direct dial numbers and company data as you browse LinkedIn or a company site, priced in credits, a revealed email costs less than a revealed phone number. Vendor-reported coverage runs into the hundreds of millions of contacts, and Lusha leans hard on compliance credentials such as ISO 27701 and SOC 2. What it is not is an outreach tool: it has no sequencer, no inbox and no message composer. It answers "who is this and how do I reach them", then hands off.

What is Chattie?

Chattie is an AI SDR (Sales Development Representative) purpose-built for LinkedIn B2B prospecting. It reads every conversation in context and writes the right reply, and you choose how much it does on its own: in Autopilot it sends within your LinkedIn limits; in Semi-pilot it sends until the lead replies, then you approve each reply; in Copilot it waits for your approval on every message. It also includes a Pipeline Kanban to track which conversations are turning into qualified meetings.

Lusha vs Chattie: Feature Comparison

FeatureChattieLusha
Core functionAI SDR, reads context, suggests repliesContact data lookup and enrichment
Native LinkedIn inboxYes: Reads and replies in-threadNo: Extension reveals data only
AI conversation memoryYes: Full thread contextNot available
Contact databaseNo: Bring your own listYes: 280M+ contacts (vendor-reported)
Drafts your messagesYes: Every reply, sent or held, your callNo outreach engine
Pipeline KanbanYes: Built-inNot available
LinkedIn ban riskFavorable: Low (25 invites/day cap)Favorable: Low (no automation)
Starting price$75/monthNo: Quote-only

* Competitor pricing approximate as of September 2026.

Pricing Comparison

Chattie

$75/month Solo (1 seat)
$190/month Growth (3 seats)
$285/month Scale (5 seats)
Quarterly billing saves 10%.

Lusha

Free tier; paid plans quote-only
* Competitor pricing approximate as of September 2026.

What three seats cost over a year

Lusha does not publish an entry price. It quotes on request, so the only real number is the one its sales team gives you.

For a figure to hold it against: Chattie Growth covers three seats for $2,280 over twelve months, at a price published on the pricing page.

Which Tool Is Right for You?

Choose Chattie if...

  • You already know who to talk to and the hard part is what to say next
  • You want conversations tracked through a pipeline, not exported as a CSV
  • You need AI that understands the thread, not a data lookup
  • You measure replies and meetings, not credits burned

Choose Lusha if...

  • You need verified direct dials and emails to build a list from scratch
  • You enrich CRM records in bulk and care about phone coverage
  • Procurement requires documented data-compliance certifications
  • Your motion is cold calling and cold email, where the number is the product

Frequently Asked Questions

No, and it does not claim to be. Lusha stops at contact data, it reveals the email and the phone number and enriches the record. Nothing in it writes, sends or tracks a conversation, which is the entire surface Chattie covers.
Lusha runs a free tier plus self-serve paid plans whose price moves with the credit volume you select, and a Scale tier that is quote-only. Because we could not verify a current figure on the vendor pricing page, we do not quote one here, check lusha.com/pricing with your own credit volume.
Yes, every reveal costs credits, and phone numbers cost several times what an email costs. That is the main budget surprise teams report. Chattie has no credit meter; the seat price is the price.
That is the natural pairing. Use Lusha to identify and verify who belongs on your list, connect on LinkedIn, and let Chattie handle every conversation that follows, including the pipeline view of where each one stands.

How this comparison is put together

Chattie publishes this page, so treat the verdict as an argument rather than a referee's call. What is checkable is stated plainly: the feature rows and both prices come from each vendor's own public pricing and product pages, read in September 2026, and the "Choose Lusha if..." column exists because there are buyers for whom Lusha is the better purchase.

What this page does not contain: no side-by-side benchmark, no deliverability or acceptance-rate test, no customer survey. Where we have no number, none is given. Pricing changes without notice, confirm both figures with the vendor before you buy. Lusha is a trademark of its owner, used here for identification.

Compare Chattie with all 37 tools

200+ B2B companies use Chattie, including

Serasa ExperianTOTVSStark BankLance!V4 CompanyFlukeAdemiconWatiVoximplantFood To SaveEnglish PassRevvoCograUjji AIWeTransactCare Code

See the difference in your next LinkedIn conversation

Autopilot sends within your LinkedIn limits; Semi-pilot sends until the lead replies, then you approve each reply; Copilot waits for your approval. See it work before you pick a plan.

3-minute interactive demo · Cancel anytime

Henrique Palmeira
The biggest contract in our operation came from our outbound strategy executed with Chattie.
Henrique Palmeira, CRO, Lance!Translated from Portuguese